Questions on kerb 4 vice kerb 5
Henry B. Hotz
hotz at jpl.nasa.gov
Fri Nov 16 20:32:44 CET 2001
At 11:31 AM +0100 11/16/01, Magnus Ahltorp wrote:
>Since AFS only handles kerberos 4, you have to get kerberos 4 tickets
>in some way, but you don't need to get your ticket-granting ticket
>with a kerberos 4 protocol. There is always v4 on the wire when
>talking to the AFS server with rxkad.
I was hoping to close port 750 and whatever rx traveled on at a
firewall and only allow k5 and the data traffic through. Thus
avoiding the k4 vulnerabilities. *sigh*
Maybe authentication is split this way already. Can I set it up so:
tgt's only come from the k5 server. You then talk rx to the AFS
servers to get the token. Is there no way to get a token (e.g.
replay attack?) without first getting the k5 tgt? Does this protect
me from the k4 vulnerabilities?
>When the rxgss security class is implemented, you will be able to
>authenticate with kerberos 5 to the AFS servers directly.
And how soon will this be possible? This year?
>Note that if you have enabled v4 kdc capabilities in Heimdal, it will
>serve v4 requests on all ports. All ports are equal in Heimdal, so
>it's not easy to firewall it.
>
>> If I understand what Magnus said then the answer is yes. The
>> authentication program to use is afslog (from Heimdal), and it will
>> work with Transarc/OpenAFS as well as Arla. That sounds like exactly
>> what I wanted to hear.
>
>Yes, if you use afslog or the Heimdal kauth/kinit program, you don't
>need to get v4 TGTs.
--
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry.B.Hotz at jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz at oxy.edu
More information about the Arla-drinkers
mailing list