arla Debian package
Adrian Bridgett
adrian.bridgett at iname.com
Sat Oct 28 23:02:44 CEST 2000
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 19:26:31 +0200 (+0000), Love wrote:
> Adrian Bridgett <adrian.bridgett at iname.com> writes:
>
> > > Wait, why do you need to combine them? I thought you just said that
> > > nothing needs both sets.
> >
> > The userland stuff doesn't appear to need the kernel stuff but the kernel
> > stuff does seem some of the userland stuff. It's just that it doesn't need
> > to be decided at kernel modules compile time AFAIK.
>
> I think only things like xfs/linux/bin need userland stuff. Or have we
> included other things ?
Yep - AFAICT you are correct. It may be as little as KERNEL_CC in fact that
I was missing. Still, there is time for cleanup later - a working debian
package is better than no package :)
> You can't just build the new configure file in xfs/ ?
Yep - "pwd=`pwd` && cd $MODSRC && autoconf -l $pwd" (where MODSRC is where
I'm building the arla-modules-source package).
Murphy's rule of packaging:
Just when you (are about to) release a package, a new version is released
Unfortunately my ISP is playing up and whenever I try and upload the
.diff.gz it disconnects me :( I may have to do this from work on monday.
Adrian
Email: adrian.bridgett at iname.com
Windows NT - Unix in beta-testing. GPG/PGP keys available on public key servers
Debian GNU/Linux -*- By professionals for professionals -*- www.debian.org
More information about the Arla-drinkers
mailing list