whining about roken.h

[Assar Westerlund]

Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz+ at cmu.edu> writes:
> Yes; that sounds entirely reasonable.  I'm also considering putting
> together a separate distribution containing lwp, rx, dx, and the various
> support things they need.  Obviously I can't usefully include rxkad, but
> perhaps if I put together a coherent distribution then KTH will pick it up,
> add rxkad, and distribute and maintain it...

At least we'll take dx, start using it, and include in all arla. :-)

Seriously, we should have some practical way of both building stuff
(like rx, rxkad, dx, roken, ...) both as stand-alone packages and as
parts of large packages.

/assar