AFS and 'afs' URI scheme

[Mykyta Yevstifeyev]

Hello all,

I am writing to request some information regarding AFS and its current 
implementations.  I hope this is the right list to ask.

So my question is whether the latest versions of current AFS 
implementation still use 'afs' URI scheme.  The 'afs' URI scheme can be 
found mentioned as reserved for further standardization in RFC 1738 
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1738) dated December 1994, but there is 
no any definition of the scheme's syntax/semantics.

Currently the 'afs' URI scheme is registered by IANA as Provisional with 
reference to RFC 1738.  In the previous year there were some some 
discussions in the IETF regarding what should be done with it.  However 
there was no consensus on any actions; two were proposed - move the 
scheme to Historical category or remain it as is.  I'd like to hear the 
opinion of AFS experts.

Thank you in advance,
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.stacken.kth.se/pipermail/arla-drinkers/attachments/20110331/469b16eb/attachment.html