For us who run more than one client at a time

[Tomas Olsson]

Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz at cmu.edu> writes:
> > This will (mis)use the ports above 7001 as callback port
> > if 7001 happens to be taken. Is this OK or do we need
> > to be more sophisticated?
> 
> That's kind of poor, since it means arlad might interfere with other 
> servers.  Why not use a random port instead?
>
Commited.

Harald, does it do what you want?

/t