is cache-only-prefixes an nnpfs limitation?

Adam Megacz megacz at cs.berkeley.edu
Tue Apr 11 20:34:37 CEST 2006


nisse at lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
> One possibly naive idea:
> ...

Yeah, I was imagining something similar.  Would this work?

  - a

-- 
PGP/GPG: 5C9F F366 C9CF 2145 E770  B1B8 EFB1 462D A146 C380



More information about the Arla-drinkers mailing list