is cache-only-prefixes an nnpfs limitation?

[Adam Megacz]

Hi,

I understand that, currently, Arla must retrieve bytes 0..n of a file
in order to access byte n+1.  Is this a limitation imposed by nnpfs,
or simply the way arlad currently works?

Specifically, I'm wondering about the possibilities of writing other
filesystems that run on top of nnpfs (including the Win32 nnpfs), and
I wanted to know if this limitation would be inherited.

  - a

-- 
PGP/GPG: 5C9F F366 C9CF 2145 E770  B1B8 EFB1 462D A146 C380