Small suggestion to add to configure

[mmarion@qualcomm.com]

On  9 Jul, Love wrote:

> What version of openssl doesn't have openssl/rand.h ?

None.. the problem is, most rpm based systems (RH and Suse at least) split the
includes and stuff off to an openssl-devel rpm that's seperate from the
binaries and libraries in the openssl rpm.  So if you tested linking against a
library to test for ssl, that doesn't actually account for the headers not
being there.

Yeah, it's stupid, but I didn't do it. 

BTW, they do that with just about everything... most stuff have a
<package>-<version>.rpm and a <package>-devel-<version>.rpm

-- 
Mike Marion-Unix SysAdmin/Staff Engineer-http://www.qualcomm.com
"HTML [e-]mail... the 90's equivalent of letters on scented stationary." --Dan
Foygel  3 Jun 1998