kafs.h from heimdal or from arla

[Richard Nyberg]

At 08 Dec 2004 21:50:11 +0100,
Rasmus Kaj wrote:
> 
> 
> Am I the only one who has the problem that #include <kafs.h> in the
> arla sources gets a kafs.h that was installed by heimdal rather than
> by arla, and which lacks some symbols (the first that the complier
> complains about is VIOCNOP).

This only happens when you specify --with-roken=/foo/bar/heimdal, right?
Anyway, perhaps some reordering of -I flags for gcc would do?

        -Richard